WB wrote:Shouldnt the moderators just be able to look at IP numbers and find out who's posting under the same names and who isn't? That'd clear up this whole "Daniel has multiple personalities" fiasco...
pryds wrote:Robb_K wrote:But I hate the fact that a large portion of my story credits don't show up. [...] I had had a 22, 21,19,17 and several 10-page stories shelved, but they still appeared in the INDUCKS database.
I assume you mean "and several 10-page stories shelved, but they still [didn't] appear[] in the INDUCKS database"?
Since the Inducks is an unofficial database, we don't always know of unprinted stories. When we do, it is often because we have received that information from the authors themselves, or from the publishers/producers office. I am not sure from where you'd expect the Inducks to get its information about unpublished stories, if not from these sources? Therefore we will be more than happy to include information you might provide about your unpublished stories. If you will help improve the Inducks with this, you should probably contact Harry Fluks (the main coordinator) about the matter: hfl at inducks dot org.
Actually all of those stories WERE included in INDUCKS, but were never transferred to COA. They were removed from the database, due to Egmont's new policy.
Ridder ter Geit wrote:Sure, find all kinds of excuses to just get rid of him and his critique.
Daniel73 wrote:On request by editor Byron Erickson, Jippes has drawn both the alternate ending and the original ending. (Is that correct?)
Daniel73 wrote:Interestingly, my additions and corrections were mostly ignored. Including Barks-indexes. Reason for ignoring the Barks-indexes was that Harry just didn't like them, mentioning rules as excuses to keep them out.
Daniel73 wrote:By telephone I've told Harry many ideas, and then he's interested and even enthousiastic. What a good ideas. But then he advices me to cope with some interface and so the ideas get lost.
Daniel73 wrote:I think this topic has shown a very interesting insight on how COA/Inducks works.
Harry wrote:You'll probably read a lot more of nonsense like this on this forum. Daniël seems to forget that Inducks is a cooperation of many people. He thinks that I can decide everything myself, and then is angry at me when I don't.
And he is also angry when I don't do exactly what he wants.
Harry wrote:I have given up on explaining things to him. He only listens to what he wants to hear.
He gets angrier at me every day. I'm not interested anymore in continuous fights with him.
Harry wrote:There are some good ideas in his postings here. But the way Daniël communicates them is not encouraging me to actually do something with his ideas.
Daniel73 wrote:But I didn't realise that only Harry has the right the get angry, as "neutral people" would say.
Daniel73 wrote:Ask Harry to pick up a Barks-book ('His Life and Times') in a shop in Germany and he keeps it for himself. And when I complain Harry tells he might give it if... I learn how to behave.
Then Harry finds it strange that I answer him that I find him a scary man. Then Harry breaks the connection. And so I hope that Harry will be very happy with that book. I don't want it anymore. My fun in owning that book is spoiled.
Just to keep some book that he was asked to pick up for me, Harry would destroy our friendship.
Harry doesn't seem to understand that I find such behaviour immoral.
Without internet Harry would still be in the desert, begging for attention in a comic book shop, as he did 16 years ago when meeting me when I was 16. I found Harry's behaviour so remarkable and intrusive that I first tried to just get rid of him, despite his knowlegde on Barks. But Harry insisted we should exchange addresses and I was too perplexed to just say no. So, I think Harry should watch his words when complaining about difficult people. Harry is very difficult himself.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests