Het is niet direct een plaatje uit de film maar er wel duidelijk op gebaseerd. Ik houd van tekeningen met veel rondingen en rimpels, van de bekendere latere WB-figuren (Chuck Jones stijl) ben ik niet zo'n fan.
Niet-Disney Fanfictie & –tekeningen
door Henrieke » do mei 15, 2008 12:03 am
Ik was op youtube 'Falling Hare' nog eens aan het bekijken...
Het is niet direct een plaatje uit de film maar er wel duidelijk op gebaseerd. Ik houd van tekeningen met veel rondingen en rimpels, van de bekendere latere WB-figuren (Chuck Jones stijl) ben ik niet zo'n fan.
Het is niet direct een plaatje uit de film maar er wel duidelijk op gebaseerd. Ik houd van tekeningen met veel rondingen en rimpels, van de bekendere latere WB-figuren (Chuck Jones stijl) ben ik niet zo'n fan.
- Henrieke
- Member
- Berichten: 153
- Geregistreerd: ma jun 19, 2006 7:12 am
door Henrieke » do mei 15, 2008 1:53 pm
Hier is wat commentaar op de tekening van gisteravond. Het is in het Engels, maar wel interessant denk ik.
Yamavu wrote:
Whoho that's different, especially the expression (wrinkle, wrinkle)
Love it a lot
Henriekeg wrote:
I based it on this part: http://www.combatreform2.com/bugsbunnyv ... remlin.jpg
But just look at this: http://bp1.blogger.com/_merbfjYjVMg/RyA ... ribner.jpg
You should look up the way Donald winks in 'Donald's nephews', when he's at the dinner table. Just awesome
http://www.theronhatch.com/blog/icontac ... s/bugs.jpg
They used like... a ruler to draw this!
Yamavu wrote:
I see what you mean, the pic below looks clean but kinda lifeless. Some people like designs like this. I'm saying designs, not drawings. Tex Avery wouldn't like this at all if he was still around.
Illustrators have to find the middle way between static art and dynamics, which isn't always easy (especially if they didn't understand the old WB inking style or worse: tried to modernize it)
I'm not sure about this one though, even though it's new style. http://www.postalmuseum.si.edu/artofthe ... sbunny.htm
Henriekeg wrote:
It's better than a lot of other drawings, but it still misses... something. It's hard to tell what it exactly is. At least he's not that skinny!
Still when looking at that picture, I don't have the idea there's an actual character standing there. It lacks weight, I think. I don't think it'd be comfortable to stand with your back against a mailbox like that. His shoulders should hang all over the mailbox, and his tail should be flattened. Now it looks like he's filled with helium, his foot doesn't seem to carry any weight and his belly is just floating there. And since this one's so 'on model': his left leg is twice as long as the other one.
And I think this last thing is personal, but I just don't think there's any appeal in the drawing! There's just no personality... I also don't really see the point of realistic shading, while using overly bright, contrasting colors.
Now I still have to learn to make good drawings myself!
Henriekeg wrote:
Thick ankles and wrists are good, btw:
http://bp2.blogger.com/_mJ4lc_Q9Q6k/Ro_ ... lSheet.jpg
I personally prefer to give characters very long necks, though. I still have to think up some sort of screwball character, since Kiki is a little too stubby for interesting poses sometimes.
Henriekeg wrote:
Okay, here's some more critics on that image...
His eyes don't seem to be an actual part of his face. We all have eyeBALLS inside are skulls, and although on most characters the eyes take up all space where their brains are supposed to be, they still are a part of the actual head, not just pasted on there. His eyes point in the same direction here while his head is egg shaped.
Bugs cheecks should be on the sides of his head, folding around the basic egg shape. In this drawing the cheecks just seem to be pasted right on the front of his face. There's no feeling of depth, you shouldn't be abled to see that grey part of the face on the left.
His toes are strange as well, they should be large and equal in size (the one in the middle moved to the front), in this drawing each toe is a little larger than the other, it nearly looks like he has four toes. Also, where's the end of his other foot? Buried in the ground?
There's not really a sense of weight in the ears or carrot either. The shiny colors make everything appear like they're made of the same material. There's no feel of texture.
Most importantly, there's no flow in the drawing, or whatever you want to call it.
I also hate is nearly invisible nose but that's just the 'new style', I guess.
If you're making a drawing you should look at each aspect of the drawing with a critical eye. How can I pose the ears so they add to the life of this drawing? How can I make the eyes more expressive? Is there a way to exaggarate the pose? All in all, how can I make the drawing less dull and more lifely?
I'm noticing large flaws on my own drawings all the time, the right cheeck on my Bugs isn't right either. But at least it's better than a lot of the official materal, wich is really sad since I'm not even that good, or an official artist of any kind.
Yamavu wrote:
Whoho that's different, especially the expression (wrinkle, wrinkle)
Love it a lot
Henriekeg wrote:
I based it on this part: http://www.combatreform2.com/bugsbunnyv ... remlin.jpg
But just look at this: http://bp1.blogger.com/_merbfjYjVMg/RyA ... ribner.jpg
You should look up the way Donald winks in 'Donald's nephews', when he's at the dinner table. Just awesome
http://www.theronhatch.com/blog/icontac ... s/bugs.jpg
They used like... a ruler to draw this!
Yamavu wrote:
I see what you mean, the pic below looks clean but kinda lifeless. Some people like designs like this. I'm saying designs, not drawings. Tex Avery wouldn't like this at all if he was still around.
Illustrators have to find the middle way between static art and dynamics, which isn't always easy (especially if they didn't understand the old WB inking style or worse: tried to modernize it)
I'm not sure about this one though, even though it's new style. http://www.postalmuseum.si.edu/artofthe ... sbunny.htm
Henriekeg wrote:
It's better than a lot of other drawings, but it still misses... something. It's hard to tell what it exactly is. At least he's not that skinny!
Still when looking at that picture, I don't have the idea there's an actual character standing there. It lacks weight, I think. I don't think it'd be comfortable to stand with your back against a mailbox like that. His shoulders should hang all over the mailbox, and his tail should be flattened. Now it looks like he's filled with helium, his foot doesn't seem to carry any weight and his belly is just floating there. And since this one's so 'on model': his left leg is twice as long as the other one.
And I think this last thing is personal, but I just don't think there's any appeal in the drawing! There's just no personality... I also don't really see the point of realistic shading, while using overly bright, contrasting colors.
Now I still have to learn to make good drawings myself!
Henriekeg wrote:
Thick ankles and wrists are good, btw:
http://bp2.blogger.com/_mJ4lc_Q9Q6k/Ro_ ... lSheet.jpg
I personally prefer to give characters very long necks, though. I still have to think up some sort of screwball character, since Kiki is a little too stubby for interesting poses sometimes.
Henriekeg wrote:
Okay, here's some more critics on that image...
His eyes don't seem to be an actual part of his face. We all have eyeBALLS inside are skulls, and although on most characters the eyes take up all space where their brains are supposed to be, they still are a part of the actual head, not just pasted on there. His eyes point in the same direction here while his head is egg shaped.
Bugs cheecks should be on the sides of his head, folding around the basic egg shape. In this drawing the cheecks just seem to be pasted right on the front of his face. There's no feeling of depth, you shouldn't be abled to see that grey part of the face on the left.
His toes are strange as well, they should be large and equal in size (the one in the middle moved to the front), in this drawing each toe is a little larger than the other, it nearly looks like he has four toes. Also, where's the end of his other foot? Buried in the ground?
There's not really a sense of weight in the ears or carrot either. The shiny colors make everything appear like they're made of the same material. There's no feel of texture.
Most importantly, there's no flow in the drawing, or whatever you want to call it.
I also hate is nearly invisible nose but that's just the 'new style', I guess.
If you're making a drawing you should look at each aspect of the drawing with a critical eye. How can I pose the ears so they add to the life of this drawing? How can I make the eyes more expressive? Is there a way to exaggarate the pose? All in all, how can I make the drawing less dull and more lifely?
I'm noticing large flaws on my own drawings all the time, the right cheeck on my Bugs isn't right either. But at least it's better than a lot of the official materal, wich is really sad since I'm not even that good, or an official artist of any kind.
- Henrieke
- Member
- Berichten: 153
- Geregistreerd: ma jun 19, 2006 7:12 am
door Robb_K » zo mei 25, 2008 7:53 pm
Hier is mijn probeersel vol 2-pagina's strip tekeningen, om te gewinnen de job tekenen het strip, Papa Moll, voor de Zwitzer uitgaver, Globi, in 1990:
Hier is een echt, gepubiceerd eerst pagina:
Hier is een echt, gepubiceerd eerst pagina:
Wat? Geen Carl Barks op dit forum? Bah!
-
Robb_K - Member
- Berichten: 92
- Geregistreerd: di apr 18, 2006 3:44 pm
- Woonplaats: Los Angeles VSA/Muenchen Duitsland
door Robb_K » zo mei 25, 2008 8:11 pm
Hier is een paar schetsjes van het hoofd figuur van een eigen strip ik was om te ontwikkelen in de eerste van de tachiger jaren. Zijn naam is "Right-On Rooster":
Wat? Geen Carl Barks op dit forum? Bah!
-
Robb_K - Member
- Berichten: 92
- Geregistreerd: di apr 18, 2006 3:44 pm
- Woonplaats: Los Angeles VSA/Muenchen Duitsland
door Henrieke » zo mei 25, 2008 10:07 pm
Kan je nog wat meer over die serie vertellen? Is er nog iets van geworden!
Die tweede schets van Right-on Rooster is leuk, er zit een mooi ritme in het ontwerp. Doet me een beetje aan Chuck Jones denken.
Die tweede schets van Right-on Rooster is leuk, er zit een mooi ritme in het ontwerp. Doet me een beetje aan Chuck Jones denken.
- Henrieke
- Member
- Berichten: 153
- Geregistreerd: ma jun 19, 2006 7:12 am
door McDuck Menu » zo mei 25, 2008 11:55 pm
Ja die tweede schets ziet er echt goed uit, ook een beetje Looney Tunes achtig. Heb je ook scenario's geschreven voor deze strip?
Hier zijn twee schetsen van paarden, nu gewoon met potlood in plaats van het tekentablet, werkt toch wel fijner:
Hier zijn twee schetsen van paarden, nu gewoon met potlood in plaats van het tekentablet, werkt toch wel fijner:
- McDuck Menu
- Member
- Berichten: 75
- Geregistreerd: wo mei 17, 2006 6:09 pm
door Robb_K » ma mei 26, 2008 1:19 am
Tim,-Je paarden zijn heel goed getekent.Ja, ik denk ook dat de tweede Right-On Rooster is best. Die is ronder en heeft meer personaliteit.
Ik heb ook een paar meer figuren voor mijn strip:
Nee, ik heb niet verkopt Right-On Rooster. Ik had maar een idee voor een scenario-Right-On als haar knipper (barbier). Ik heb had opdenken om een toneel met Donald knippen haar van slecht kinderen.
Ik heb ook een paar meer figuren voor mijn strip:
Nee, ik heb niet verkopt Right-On Rooster. Ik had maar een idee voor een scenario-Right-On als haar knipper (barbier). Ik heb had opdenken om een toneel met Donald knippen haar van slecht kinderen.
Wat? Geen Carl Barks op dit forum? Bah!
-
Robb_K - Member
- Berichten: 92
- Geregistreerd: di apr 18, 2006 3:44 pm
- Woonplaats: Los Angeles VSA/Muenchen Duitsland
door Henrieke » wo jun 18, 2008 2:38 pm
De tekeningen voor de dierentuin zijn eindelijk klaar, ze moeten binnen een maand in Kerkrade te zien zijn.
Hier is alvast het plaatje met de zebra's, die ik als eerste heb gemaakt. Met een heel zwamverhaal over zebraondersoorten er bij.
http://henrieke.deviantart.com/art/Zebras-89035410
Hier is alvast het plaatje met de zebra's, die ik als eerste heb gemaakt. Met een heel zwamverhaal over zebraondersoorten er bij.
http://henrieke.deviantart.com/art/Zebras-89035410
- Henrieke
- Member
- Berichten: 153
- Geregistreerd: ma jun 19, 2006 7:12 am
door Henrieke » do jun 19, 2008 10:58 pm
http://henrieke.deviantart.com/art/More ... k-89154595
http://henrieke.deviantart.com/art/More ... e-89154629
Nog een aantal tekeningen voor op de bordjes.
http://henrieke.deviantart.com/art/More ... e-89154629
Nog een aantal tekeningen voor op de bordjes.
- Henrieke
- Member
- Berichten: 153
- Geregistreerd: ma jun 19, 2006 7:12 am
Keer terug naar Eigen creativiteit
Wie is er online
Gebruikers op dit forum: Geen geregistreerde gebruikers. en 1 gast